|
This
is the first in a series of studies concerning
that institution for which Christ died and
bought with his own precious blood, and which
was filled with his Spirit. I refer to the
institution that we designate the church. It is
my firm belief that it is possible for men and
women today to become members of the church that
Jesus built. Perhaps it is hardly necessary to
attempt to prove that there is such an
institution as the church now in existence,
since the great majority of people now believe
that God does have an organization properly
styled "the church" now upon the earth. In this
study, I want to show the time of its
establishment.
Different Terms Refer To The
Church
There are different terms used to refer to this
institution in the New Testament. The expression
"kingdom of heaven" sometimes refers to the
ultimate state of heaven; sometimes it is used
to refer to those attributes that belong to the
people of God; and sometimes it is used to refer
to the church.
From the standpoint of its government, it is
called a "kingdom." That means that it is not
like the United States government, which is a
representative democracy. In the making of the
laws of the United States, the people have a
voice. But in the church, we have no voice, for
it is a kingdom, a monarchy. That means that
Jesus Christ is the ruler supreme. In him are
vested all the departments - legislative,
judicial, and executive. Its laws are perfect
and no single man or council of men has the
right to revise, amend or strike out any of its
laws.
From the standpoint of its organization, it is
called a "body." In this respect, it is like the
human body. We are the members of the body, and
Jesus Christ is the head. Every member,
therefore, is subject to the directions and
orders of the head.
From the standpoint of its relationship to the
world, it is properly called the church, which
means the, "called out," or the "separated."
Those who are in the church are "called out" to
be separate and distinct from the world in
general. But today, we are interested in the
time of the establishment of the church.
The Time Of Its Establishment
Various theories, either true or false, are
connected with the time of its establishment.
Some have suggested that it does not matter when
the church was established, but I believe that
it does matter, because of its relationship to
these various theories.
There is a theory, which says that the church
existed before creation. This theory is based
upon the idea that before creation, God had
already determined the identity of every member
of the church, to the extent that from that time
until now it has neither increased nor decreased
by a single soul. As you know perhaps, that led
to the doctrine of election and predestination
of individuals as taught by some.
There is another theory, which states that the
church was established in the days of Abraham.
This theory led to the doctrine of infant church
membership. They assume that just as there were
infants in the family of Abraham, and that they
were inducted by the rite of circumcision, even
so in the church there is room for babies, and
they should be sprinkled and inducted into the
church. On this point, however, I would like to
note that circumcision in Abraham's day was not
an initiation into family fellowship, but on the
other hand the male children were circumcised
because they were born into Abraham's house.
Even then, only the male babies were circumcised
so why it is that baby girls should be sprinkled
on that basis, I have never been able to
understand.
There is another theory that the church was
established in the days of John the Baptist, and
there was a time when people who believed that
had the courage to announce it, affirm it, and
defend it. Why they will no longer do so is no
doubt because they have found that such a theory
cannot be defended with the word of God.
The church of the New Testament could not have
been in existence before the New Testament
itself became effective. The divine writer very
distinctly says in
Hebrews 9:16, 17
that where a testament is, there must of
necessity be the death of the man who made it,
for a testament is of force after men are dead.
It is a contradiction of terms to talk about the
church of the New Testament having been in
existence prior to the effectiveness and force
of the New Testament.
I would also point out that the institution of
which Jesus is the head is not simply a
continuation of the organization back in
Abraham's day. It is something new, distinct,
and separate from the congregation that existed
then. The divine writer said, in
Hebrews 8:6-13:
"But now hath he obtained a more excellent
ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of
a better covenant, which was established upon
better promises. For if that first covenant had
been faultless, then should no place have been
sought for the second. For finding fault with
them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the
Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the
house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not
according to the covenant that I made with their
fathers in the day when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because
they continued not in my covenant, and I
regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is
the covenant that I will make with the house of
Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will
put my laws into their mind, and write them in
their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and
they shall be to me a people: And they shall not
every man his neighbor, and every man his
brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall
know me, from the least to the greatest. For I
will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and
their sins and their iniquities will I remember
no more. In that he saith, A new covenant, he
hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth
and waxeth old is ready to vanish away."
Therefore, we understand that that organization,
that covenant and institution under Jesus Christ
is a new affair and quite different from that
institution of the old testament in the days of
the fathers.
The apostle Paul taught the same thing to the
Ephesians: "But now in Christ Jesus ye who
sometimes were afar off (by this he refers to
the Gentiles) are made nigh by the blood of
Christ. For he is our peace, who hath made both
one, and hath broken down the middle wall of
partition between us; having abolished in his
flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments
contained in ordinances; for to make - (What
does that mean? It means that he might make, or
for the purpose of making) - for to make one new
man, so making peace; and that he might
reconcile both unto God in one body by the
cross, having slain the enmity thereby" (Ephesians
2:13-16).
Here it is affirmed that Christ broke down the
law of commandments that he might make "one new
man" i.e., "one new body."
The institution about which so much is said was
established, inaugurated, and set up on the
Pentecost following the resurrection of Christ.
So far as I know, every scholar of any note who
has written on the matter has come to
acknowledge that Pentecost marks the birthday
and the beginning of the church of Christ, the
church of the New Testament. Lengthy arguments
might be made, but please notice some plain and
simple statements on the matter.
Sacred Prophecy and History Show
The Time
About 600 years before Christ, in the days of
Daniel, Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, had
a dream. He wanted to know the meaning of that
dream, but there was a problem - he had
forgotten the dream. His magicians and wise men
were called in but they were unable to help.
After a time, a Hebrew prophet by the name of
Daniel was brought in. With God's help, Daniel
was not only able to tell him the dream but also
to reveal the interpretation thereof. He said,
in
Daniel 2:31-35:
"Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great
image." Daniel related that the "head of this
terrible image was of gold, the breast and arms
were of silver, the belly and thighs were of
brass, the legs were of iron, and its feet part
of iron and part of clay."
In
Daniel 2:36-45,
Daniel gave the interpretation. He told
Nebuchadnezzar: "Thou art this head of gold."
I.e., that head of gold represented
Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonian Empire.
Another empire would rise after him, represented
by the silver chest and arms. That was the Medo-Persian
Empire, dating from 536 B.C. After that came
Alexander the Great, represented by the belly of
brass. This was divided under four generals and
later merged into the Egyptian and Syrian,
represented by the thighs of the great image.
The fourth inferior kingdom that was to arise
was the Roman Empire, whose army swept over all
the earth and ruled the world from the
seven-hilled city of Rome. Look at it now! The
Caesars are on the throne, and the Herods are in
the land of Palestine. Daniel says, in
Daniel 2:44,
"In the days of these kings shall the God of
heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be
destroyed." Therefore, according to sacred
prophecy and history, God's government was
established upon the earth while the Romans held
sway over the civilized affairs of mankind.
Sacred testimony also bears out the fact that
during the days of the Herods, and in the days
of the Caesars, the forerunner of Jesus, John
the Baptist, came to announce that the kingdom
of heaven is at hand.
Not Established During John's or
Jesus' Ministries
After John was cast into prison and his labors
were ended, Jesus taught his disciples to pray
as follows: "Our Father which art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, etc." It
is certain that Jesus would not have taught them
to pray for that which had already come. Many
people thoughtlessly repeat that same prayer
today, even since the kingdom has come. We
should pray, "Thy kingdom continue." Also, in
Matthew 18:3,
Jesus rebuked the disciples, saying, "Except ye
be converted, and become as little children, ye
shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven."
They were not in it at that time, for the
kingdom had not yet been established.
When Jesus gathered the disciples away from the
multitudes, he took them to the city of Caesarea
Philippi and asked them what the people thought
about his identity. They said: "Some say John
the Baptist, some Elias, and others Jeremias or
one of the prophets." Jesus said, "Whom say ye
that I am?" Peter said, "Thou art the Christ,
the son of the living God." Jesus said, "Blessed
art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood
hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father
which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee,
That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will
build my church; and the gates of hell shall not
prevail against it." Upon what rock? Not upon
Peter--he was the gatekeeper, not the
foundation. Upon the great truth confessed,
"Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living
God." We understand therefore that it is the
church of Christ, by virtue of the fact that he
built it and he bought it, and became head over
it in all things.
Jesus said, "I will build my church." Now, if at
that time he meant for us to understand that it
was already in existence, Jesus certainly misled
the human family by using the verb "will build."
Every school teacher, and probably every school
child knows, that "will build" could not refer
to enlargement or embellishment or edification,
because Christ calls attention to the fact that
he "will build" it right from the foundation.
But again in
Mark 9:1,
the Saviour, in talking to the disciples said,
"There be some of them that stand here, which
shall not taste of death, till they have seen
the kingdom of God come with power." Thus he
implies: (1) That the kingdom is going to be
established in the not-far-distant future. I.e.,
some of you will not have tasted death until the
kingdom of God comes - in their lifetimes. (2)
When it does come, here is one of the ways it
will be known--it will come with "power." It
will come with "power from on high."
Do you remember that Jesus said in his great
commission to the disciples, "Tarry ye in the
city of Jerusalem until ye be endued with power
from on high?" At that time, they did not have
the power, but they were to wait in the city of
Jerusalem until power from on high came upon
them. Also, do you remember that just before
Jesus' ascension into heaven, the disciples
asked Jesus: "Lord, wilt thou at this time
restore again the kingdom to Israel?" He
answered: "It is not for you to know the times
or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his
own power. But ye shall receive power, after
that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye
shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem,
and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the
uttermost part of the earth." (Acts
1:6-8).
Thus, it is clear that the "kingdom of God" was
to come within their lifetimes. It was to be
characterized by the power that accompanied it.
They were to receive that power after that the
Holy Spirit came upon them. Therefore, if I find
when the spirit came, I will determine when the
power came, and will also settle when the
kingdom came, for these three things kingdom,
power, and spirit, were to be simultaneous in
their coming. What happened? The Spirit came on
the day of Pentecost (Acts
2:1-4).
Therefore, when the Spirit came, the power came,
and with the power, the kingdom of Christ,
according to Christ's promise in
Mark 9:1.
On the day of Pentecost, Peter preached the
gospel to a great concourse of people. After
explaining the outpouring of the Spirit, Peter
described the crucifixion of Christ as a
fulfillment of prophecy (Acts
2:22-24).
He next argued that Jesus was exalted to sit on
David's throne and "hath shed forth this which
ye now see and hear" (Acts
2:25-33).
He climaxed his sermon in verse 36 with these
words: "Therefore let all the house of Israel
know assuredly, that God hath made that same
Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and
Christ."
The time has now come; the knock has been
sounded; it is time for Peter to insert the key,
and unlock the door and swing it wide open. He
did that by commanding repentance and baptism
for the remission of sins (Acts
2:38).
From that time, the day of Pentecost, A. D. 33,
the church is spoken of in the Bible as history.
Do you not wish to be added to the church of
Christ?
|